Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1988 | BC 1988 03555 1
Original file (BC 1988 03555 1.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
                           ADDENDUM TO
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-1988-03555

			COUNSEL:  

			HEARING DESIRED: YES

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His discharge be upgraded to an Honorable Discharge.  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

1.  A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board on 
27 March 1989.  For an accounting of the facts and circumstances 
surrounding the applicant’s discharge and the rationale of the 
earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings 
(ROP) at Exhibit F.  

2.  On 6 February 2013, the applicant submitted a request for 
reconsideration.  In a combined 42-page brief of counsel and the 
applicant’s personal petition to the Board, the following 
contentions are made:  

		a.  He is not the young and troubled man who was court-
martialed and dismissed from the Air Force in 1986.  He has 
grown into a responsible father, minister, public school 
teacher, and dedicated fire professional who puts his life on 
the line for his community every time he dons the uniform of 
firefighter.  Through decades of acts both large and small, he 
has proven that he is a valued member of his community.  To go 
from a drug abusing Air Force Captain who was court-martialed 
for being late, and for an unauthorized absence, to being 
eligible to be promoted as a Fire Lieutenant in his local 
community Fire Department represents a level of rehabilitation 
and achievement that few people could have achieved.  The 
discharge from the military remains a lodestone around his neck.  
He hopes he has demonstrated that he is the kind of person 
deserving of a second chance, and that the Board will approve 
the discharge upgrade.  

		b.  He spent over a year putting together information that 
describes the mistakes he made while in service, how he turned 
his life around after leaving the Air Force, and how he became a 
minister, professional firefighter, and public school teacher. 
The documents also describe how he has been drug free for more 
than 25 years.  If anyone can honestly say that they have had a 
positive influence on their community for a sustained period, he 
believes he can say so.   

		c.  In 1984, he made selfish choices based upon superficial 
needs and wants that brought neither happiness nor satisfaction. 
As a Christian and a minister, he has come to terms with his old 
self and has found the knowledge, wisdom, and strength to live a 
life of worth that is of service and benefit to others. He now 
lives a drug and alcohol free life and is employed as a 
professional firefighter/EMT-B and educator. He has been 
extremely involved in the parenting of his son.  He is actively 
involved in local ministry, community issues and works with 
local community leaders.  He strives to be an example to young 
people through his position as a firefighter instructor.  He has 
worked to create pathways for employment and higher education 
for his students.  He has also continued to further his own 
education over the years and has obtained two graduate degrees, 
a Master of Education (2010), and a Master of Divinity (1997), 
as well as numerous certifications and professional development 
credentials.  

3.  In support of his request, he submits his counsels 
statement, his petition labeled “Tested by Fire,” and an 
extensive package of supporting documents pertaining to events 
surrounding his court-martial, discharge and post-service 
information.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit G. 

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  In an earlier finding, the Board determined there was 
insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action.  After 
thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in 
support of his appeal and the evidence of record, we do not 
believe the applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in 
the previous decision.  While the evidence provided indicates 
that the applicant has made a successful post-service 
adjustment, and notwithstanding his otherwise good service 
record, in view of the extreme seriousness of the offense 
committed during the period of service under review, we are not 
persuaded that the characterization of his discharge should be 
upgraded based on clemency.  Therefore, in view of the above, 
and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis 
upon which to recommend favorable reconsideration of the 
applicant’s request.  

2.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) 
involved.  Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 14 November 2013, under the provisions 
of AFI 36-2603:

			, Panel Chair
			, Member
			, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR 
Docket Number BC-1988-03555:

    Exhibit F.  ROP, dtd 27 March 1989, w/Exhibits A through E.
    Exhibit G.  DD Form 149, dtd 6 February 2013, w/atchs.




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-1988-03555-1

    Original file (BC-1988-03555-1.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1988-03555 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be upgraded to an Honorable Discharge. He now lives a drug and alcohol free life and is employed as a professional firefighter/EMT-B and educator. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002616

    Original file (20140002616.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge and correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show a different narrative reason for separation and separation code. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally issued to an individual who is discharged for the good of the service.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01423

    Original file (MD03-01423.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01423 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030827. They know what the discharge board needs to see to ensure a discharge the first time through. His records were reviewed on December 12, 2003 and the following comments are hereby submitted:The Applicant was discharge from the Marine Corps on June 6, 1994 from Boot Camp after Approximately two and one half months with an Uncharacterized Discharge because he the Marine Corps said that he fail to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018381

    Original file (20140018381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. d. Part Va (Performance and Potential Evaluation (Rater) - Evaluate the Rated Officer's Performance During the Rating Period and His/Her Potential for Promotion), the rater placed an "X" in the "Other," block and entered the following comments: While [Applicant's] duty performance was satisfactory during the rated period, his off-duty conduct was unbecoming of an officer and of a nature to bring discredit upon the Armed Forces. His...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018712

    Original file (20140018712.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was 20 years and 6 months of age at the time. d. The applicant was 18 years of age at the time of his first enlistment and 20 years of age at the time of his reenlistment. He was 21 years of age when he was convicted by a court-martial the first time and 23 years of age when he was convicted by a court-martial the second time.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00631

    Original file (ND02-00631.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020404, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. No indication of appeal in the record.870629: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.870707: CNMPC directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. Relief...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00412

    Original file (FD2003-00412.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s. Additionally, he received three Letters of Reprimand, three Letters of Counseling and three Memorandums for Record for failure to obey an order, sleeping on duty, disrespectful towards a superior NCO, failure to go, dereliction of duty, unprofessional attitude, poor work ethic, violation of dress and appearance standards, failure to comply with instructions, unauthorized use of a government computer, and financial...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0144

    Original file (FD2002-0144.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    When I was midway through basic training, I asked for a job that was less than the one I would be good at, although still desirable, one I thought would be good for me. I realize this every time I look at what I could have in the service and what time I did not use properly. For this misconduct, he received an AF Form 174, Record of Individual Counseling, on 22 Feb 0 1. was, at Fort Leonard Wood MO and a onco commissioned office received an LOR on 23 Jan 01.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC 2008 04046

    Original file (BC 2008 04046.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-04046 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty of “Adjustment Disorder” be changed. In an application dated 9 Nov 09 [sic], AFBCMR Docket Number BC- 2008-04046, the applicant requested...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00078

    Original file (FD2005-00078.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME O F SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAI,) GRADE AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD I I MEMBER SITTING HON I GEN UOTHC I OTHER I DENY VOTE OF THE BOARD ISSUES A94.06 A93.02 INDEX NUMBER A67.70 1 HEARING DATE / CASENUMBER I I I EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO TRE BmRD I 1 2 3 4 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTlFlCATlON BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL...